agonistic anti cd40 antibody (Leinco Technologies)
Structured Review

Agonistic Anti Cd40 Antibody, supplied by Leinco Technologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd40+agonist+antibody/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__01__24__701412-49-28-32?v=Leinco+Technologies
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Antigen presentation requirements for effective cDC1-based cancer immunotherapy"
Article Title: Antigen presentation requirements for effective cDC1-based cancer immunotherapy
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.01.24.701412
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic of the workflow used to generate cDC1s from WT, MHC-I KO , or MHC-II KO mice in vitro . BM cells were cultured in medium containing Flt3L and GM-CSF, followed by FACS purification, poly dI:dC stimulation, and incubation with OVA. ( B ) Flow cytometry histogram plots showing cell surface expression of MHC-I (H2-K b ) and MHC-II (I-A/I-E) on cDC1s after 16 hours under the indicated conditions. n = 6 (WT), n = 2 (MHC-I KO ), n = 4 (MHC-II KO ); representative data from at least two independent experiments. ( C ) Bulk RNA-seq analysis of cDC1s in steady-state conditions (no stim) or following stimulation with poly dI:dC with or without αCD40, as indicated. The heatmaps show log 2 (TPM + 1) gene expression, grouped according to cDC1 functions. ( D ) Mapping of bulk RNA-seq profiles from in vitro -derived cDC1s onto mouse or human tumor-infiltrating DC scRNA-seq reference datasets using ProjectLSI. Reference scRNA-seq cells are displayed as dots, and bulk RNA-seq samples are overlaid as shapes, corresponding to individual genotypes, as indicated.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Cell Culture, Purification, Incubation, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, RNA Sequencing, Gene Expression, Derivative Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Representative flow cytometry histograms (left) showing CD40 surface expression on WT and MHC-II KO cDC1s after 4-hour stimulation in vitro , with quantification of CD40 + frequency and CD40 MFI (right). n = 4 per group for all conditions; cumulative data from two independent experiments. ( B ) Schematic of the in vivo experimental design. cDC1s were stimulated in vitro with either poly dI:dC or poly dI:dC and αCD40 and pulsed with OVA for 4 hours, then prepared for vaccination as described in the Materials and Methods. WT mice were implanted with B16-OVA tumors on day 0 and treated intratumorally on days 4 and 7 with either PBS or cDC1 vaccines. ( C ) Representative mean tumor area (mm 2 ) over time. ( D ) Individual tumor growth curves corresponding to mice in ( C ). ( C, D ) n = 5 mice per group; representative of one of two independent experiments. ( E ) Cumulative mouse survival representing time to humane endpoint, defined as tumors reaching 15 mm in any direction. n = 10 mice per group, cumulative data from two independent experiments. ( A, C ) Data shown are the mean ± S.E.M. and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test applied to ( A) . ( E ) Survival was analyzed by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Expressing, In Vitro, In Vivo, Vaccines
